In re A.P. CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 12, 2021C093294California872 words

Opinion

Opinion

Hoch, J.

BACKGROUND

In March 2020, the minor admitted the allegations of a section 602 petition that he had committed a battery on his girlfriend. (Pen. Code, § 243, subd. (e)(1).) The juvenile court placed the minor on a summary nonwardship probation under section 725, subdivision. (a). While on probation, the minor admitted the allegations of a second section 602 petition that he committed a misdemeanor hit and run (Veh. Code, § 20002, subd. (a)) and a traffic infraction (Veh. Code, § 21460, subd. (a)), and that in so doing, he had violated the terms of his section 725 probation. On December 14, 2020, the juvenile court again placed defendant on a summary nonwardship probation and dismissed the prior petitions. The juvenile court imposed a number of terms and conditions of probation beyond those delineated in section 725, subdivision (a).3 The minor did not object to the

2 The notice of appeal was filed on December 23, 2020. Due to multiple extensions to the briefing schedule, this case was not fully briefed until August 3, 2021. Appellant did not advise this court of any urgency in this appeal based on the abbreviated probationary period. Section 725, subdivision (a) states as to a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.