United States v. Surjit Singh

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 12 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 20-16492

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. Nos. 3:19-cv-00591-LRH 3:13-cr-00118-LRH- v. WGC-

SURJIT SINGH, AKA Sonny,

MEMORANDUM*

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Larry R. Hicks, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 9, 2021** San Francisco, California

Before: OWENS, BADE, and LEE, Circuit Judges.

Surjit Singh appeals pro se from the district court’s denial of his petition for

a writ of error coram nobis under 28 U.S.C. § 1651. We have jurisdiction under

U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Matus-Leva v. United States, 287 F.3d 758,

760 (9th Cir. 2002), and we affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).…