Toddella Brown v. Homestreet Bank

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 12, 202119-56132California953 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 12 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

TODDELLA D. BROWN, No. 19-56132

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 5:18-cv-02379-JGB-SHK v.

HOMESTREET BANK; et al., MEMORANDUM*

Defendants-Appellees,

and

JOHN DOE, 1,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Jesus G. Bernal, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 9, 2021** San Francisco, California

Before: OWENS, BADE, and LEE, Circuit Judges.

Toddella D. Brown appeals pro se the district court’s dismissal of her

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). wrongful foreclosure action against HomeStreet Bank, Mortgage Electronic

Registration Systems, Inc. (“MERS”), Government National Mortgage Association

(“Ginnie Mae”), and Zieve, Brodnax, & Steele, LLP. We review de…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.