Toddella Brown v. Homestreet Bank
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 12, 202119-56132California953 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 12 2021
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
TODDELLA D. BROWN, No. 19-56132
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 5:18-cv-02379-JGB-SHK v.
HOMESTREET BANK; et al., MEMORANDUM*
Defendants-Appellees,
and
JOHN DOE, 1,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Jesus G. Bernal, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted November 9, 2021** San Francisco, California
Before: OWENS, BADE, and LEE, Circuit Judges.
Toddella D. Brown appeals pro se the district court’s dismissal of her
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). wrongful foreclosure action against HomeStreet Bank, Mortgage Electronic
Registration Systems, Inc. (“MERS”), Government National Mortgage Association
(“Ginnie Mae”), and Zieve, Brodnax, & Steele, LLP. We review de…