Tashia Channel v. Denis McDonough
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 12, 202120-16211California470 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 12 2021
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
TASHIA CHANNEL, No. 20-16211
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:18-cv-02414-MCE-AC
v.
MEMORANDUM*
DENIS McDONOUGH, Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs; et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Morrison C. England, Jr., District Judge, Presiding
Submitted November 8, 2021**
Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.
Tashia Channel appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing
her action alleging various claims concerning her federal employment. We have
jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Dougherty v. City of
Covina, 654 F.3d 892, 897 (9th Cir. 2011) (dismissal for failure to state a claim);
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.…