Siokapesi Vilingia v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 12, 202118-71717California315 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 12 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SIOKAPESI ANAUKIMOANA No. 18-71717 VILINGIA, AKA Siokapesi Hola, Agency No. A088-771-044 Petitioner,

v. MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted November 8, 2021**

Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

Siokapesi Anaukimoana Vilingia, a native and citizen of Tonga, petitions for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying her motion to

reopen removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We

review for abuse of discretion the BIA’s denial of a motion to reopen. Mohammed

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). v. Gonzales, 400 F.3d 785, 791-92 (9th Cir. 2005).…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.