Ronnie Smith v. City of Dalles

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 12, 202120-35871California679 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 12 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RONNIE SMITH, No. 20-35871

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:19-cv-00338-SI

v.

MEMORANDUM*

CITY OF DALLES, In its official capacity as a political and public entity in the State of Oregon; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Michael H. Simon, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 8, 2021**

Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

Ronnie Smith appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging federal and state law claims arising from an

arrest and prosecution for theft. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). review de novo. Stephens v. Union Pac. R.R. Co.,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.