Norman Herterich v. Ernest Goldsmith
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 12, 202120-17197California370 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 12 2021
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
NORMAN BARTSCH HERTERICH, No. 20-17197
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 4:20-cv-03992-SBA
v.
MEMORANDUM*
ERNEST H. GOLDSMITH; et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Saundra B. Armstrong, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted November 8, 2021**
Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.
Norman Bartsch Herterich appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging constitutional violations arising
from a California state court case involving his father’s estate. We have
jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal under Fed. R.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Civ. P. 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6).…