Norman Herterich v. City & County of San Francisco

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 12, 202120-16286California372 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 12 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

NORMAN BARTSCH HERTERICH, No. 20-16286

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 4:19-cv-07754-SBA

v.

MEMORANDUM*

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN

FRANCISCO; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Saundra B. Armstrong, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 8, 2021**

Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

Norman Bartsch Herterich appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging constitutional violations arising

from California state court proceedings involving his father’s estate. We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal under Fed. R.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Civ. P. 12(b)(1)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.