Isaiah Hoover v. Swift Transportation Company

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 12, 202120-16088California253 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 12 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ISAIAH HOOVER, No. 20-16088

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:18-cv-03314-JAT

v.

MEMORANDUM*

SWIFT TRANSPORTATION COMPANY;

et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona James A. Teilborg, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 8, 2021**

Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

Isaiah Hoover appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing

his action alleging federal and state law claims arising from his employment as a

student driver. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). In his opening brief, Hoover fails to address the grounds for dismissal and

has therefore waived his challenge to the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.