Gyorgy Matrai v. Joni Hiramoto

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 12, 202121-15084California1,832 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 12 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GYORGY MATRAI, and M.M., a MINOR, No. 21-15084

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:20-cv-05241-MMC

v.

MEMORANDUM*

HON. JONI T. HIRAMOTO and

MICHELLE GONZANA URIARTE,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Maxine M. Chesney, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 4, 2021** San Francisco, California

Before: FRIEDLAND and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges, and MCSHANE,*** District Judge.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36–3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2)(C). *** The Honorable Michael J. McShane, United States District Judge for the District of Oregon, sitting by designation. In his claim brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, Plaintiff–Appellant Gyorgy

Matrai alleges that a child abduction prevention order requiring him to post…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.