Gerry Williams v. Martin Biter

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 12, 202119-17186California388 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 12 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GERRY WILLIAMS, No. 19-17186

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 1:14-cv-02076-DAD-EPG

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MARTIN BITER, Warden; A.

MANASRAH,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Dale A. Drozd, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 8, 2021**

Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner Gerry Williams appeals pro se from the district

court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging federal claims.

We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of

discretion the district court’s decision on a motion for reconsideration. Sch. Dist.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). No. 1J, Multnomah County, Or. v.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.