Ernesto Hernandez-Velasco v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 12, 202119-71168California631 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 12 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ERNESTO HERNANDEZ-VELASCO, No. 19-71168

Petitioner, Agency No. A205-576-046

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted November 8, 2021**

Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

Ernesto Hernandez-Velasco, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to

reopen and dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision

denying his applications for withholding of removal, relief under the Convention

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Against Torture (“CAT”), and cancellation of removal. Our jurisdiction is

governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.