Alexander Hamilton v. Ron Davis

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 12, 202120-16495California676 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 12 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ALEXANDER RASHAD HAMILTON, No. 20-16495

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 4:19-cv-01223-JST

v.

MEMORANDUM*

RON DAVIS, Warden; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Jon S. Tigar, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 9, 2021** San Francisco, California

Before: OWENS, BADE, and LEE, Circuit Judges.

Alexander Rashad Hamilton, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the

district court’s dismissal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A of his civil rights action

concerning prison disciplinary proceedings at San Quentin State Prison. We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and review de novo. Hayes v. Idaho Corr.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Ctr., 849 F.3d 1204,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.