Alexander Hamilton v. Ron Davis
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 12, 202120-16495California676 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 12 2021
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ALEXANDER RASHAD HAMILTON, No. 20-16495
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 4:19-cv-01223-JST
v.
MEMORANDUM*
RON DAVIS, Warden; et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Jon S. Tigar, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted November 9, 2021** San Francisco, California
Before: OWENS, BADE, and LEE, Circuit Judges.
Alexander Rashad Hamilton, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the
district court’s dismissal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A of his civil rights action
concerning prison disciplinary proceedings at San Quentin State Prison. We have
jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and review de novo. Hayes v. Idaho Corr.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Ctr., 849 F.3d 1204,…