Wertheim, LLC v. Currency Corporation

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 12, 2021B304655MCalifornia4,345 words

Opinion

Opinion

Chaney, J.

Filed 11/12/21 (unmodified opn. attached)

CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

WERTHEIM, LLC, B304655

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC328263) v.

CURRENCY CORPORATION,

Defendant and Appellant. ___________________________________

WERTHEIM, LLC, B310650

Plaintiff and Appellant, ORDER MODIFYING OPINION

AND DENYING REHEARING

v. [NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT]

CURRENCY CORPORATION,

Defendant and Respondent.

THE COURT:

It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on October 14, 2021, be modified as follows: At the end of page 12 extending to page 13, the last sentence is modified to read: “However, Wertheim also modified that form by interlineation, specifying that the acknowledgement applied only to a postjudgment interest payment made by Currency.” On page 16, the last sentence of the first paragraph is modified to read: “Equity does not support an award of Wertheim’s appellate attorney’s fees.” On page 16, the first sentence of the third paragraph is modified to read:…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.