Peter Munoz, Jr. v. Gregory Smith
Opinion
Opinion
Bress, J.
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
PETER J. MUNOZ, JR., No. 20-16327 Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 3:11-cv-00197-
LRH-RAM
GREGORY SMITH, Warden; ATTORNEY
GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA, OPINION
Respondents-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Larry R. Hicks, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted June 18, 2021 San Francisco, California
Filed November 15, 2021
Before: Daniel A. Bress and Patrick J. Bumatay, Circuit Judges, and Douglas L. Rayes, * District Judge.
Opinion by Judge Bress
* The Honorable Douglas L. Rayes, United States District Judge for the District of Arizona, sitting by designation. SUMMARY **
Habeas Corpus
Vacating the district court’s order denying on the merits Peter J. Munoz, Jr.’s federal habeas corpus petition challenging the lifetime supervision imposed on him by the State of Nevada, and remanding for further proceedings, the panel held that the district court lacked jurisdiction to adjudicate the petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254.