United States v. Marco Duenas-Garcia

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 15, 202120-50346California383 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 15 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 20-50346

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 3:18-cr-00977-JLS-

v.

MARCO JORDAN DUENAS-GARCIA, MEMORANDUM*

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Janis L. Sammartino, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 8, 2021**

Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

Marco Jordan Duenas-Garcia appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges the 18-month sentence imposed upon his second revocation of

supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Duenas-Garcia contends that the district court procedurally erred by failing

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). to address his mitigating…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.