United States v. Dequandre Davis

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 15, 202120-30220California488 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

NOV 15 2021

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 20-30220

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 3:18-cr-00358-MO-

v.

MEMORANDUM*

DEQUANDRE RAYMONE DAVIS,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Michael W. Mosman, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 10, 2021** Portland, Oregon

Before: GRABER and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges, and WU,*** District Judge.

Defendant Dequandre Raymone Davis timely appeals the sentence of

months’ imprisonment imposed upon revocation of his supervised release.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable George H. Wu, United States District Judge for the Central District of California, sitting by designation. Reviewing de novo the district court’s interpretation of the Sentencing Guidelines,

United…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.