United States v. Daniel Miller

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 15, 202121-10117California407 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 15 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 21-10117

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 4:09-cr-02292-RM-BGM-1 v.

DANIEL AARON MILLER, MEMORANDUM*

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Rosemary Márquez, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 8, 2021**

Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

Daniel Aaron Miller appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges seven conditions of supervised release imposed on revocation of

supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We vacate the

district court’s judgment and remand for it to reconsider special condition 6, and to

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). correct the judgment with respect to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.