Gulinder Singh v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 15, 202118-72753California590 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 15 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GULINDER SINGH, No. 18-72753

Petitioner, Agency No. A205-586-641

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted November 10, 2021** Seattle, Washington

Before: GOULD, TALLMAN, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges. Dissent by Judge GOULD

Gulinder Singh, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the Board

of Immigration Appeals’ order affirming the denial of his applications for asylum,

withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). (CAT). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We deny the petition for

review.

1. Substantial evidence supports the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.