David Hinkson v. United States
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 15, 202119-71881California524 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 15 2021
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
DAVID ROLAND HINKSON, No. 19-71881
Applicant,
v. ORDER
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Respondent.
Application to File Second or Successive Petition Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Submitted November 15. 2021*
Before: OWENS, BADE, and LEE, Circuit Judges.
We have reviewed the application for authorization to file a second or
successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion in the district court, as supplemented by
Docket Entry No. 23,1 the response,2 and the reply. The application, as
* The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 1 The applicant’s motion to supplement his application to add a claim under United States v. Davis, 139 S. Ct. 2319 (2019), filed at Docket Entry No. 10, is denied. 2 Respondent’s motion for judicial notice is granted as to the district court’s August 28, 2012, memorandum decision and order in United States District…