People v. Ansley CA2/6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 15, 2021B303998California530 words

Opinion

Opinion

Discussion The information alleged that appellant had knowingly possessed “Marijuana [cannabis], while in the California Men[’]s Colony.” The petition was filed pursuant to Health and Safety Code section 11361.8, enacted in 2016 by Proposition 64, the initiative known as the Control, Regulate and Tax Adult Use of Marijuana Act (Marijuana Act).1 Section 11361.8, subdivision (a) provides, “A person currently serving a sentence for a conviction . . . who would not have been guilty of an offense . . . under the . . . Marijuana Act had that act been in effect at the time of the offense may petition for a recall or dismissal of sentence before the trial court that entered the judgment of conviction . . . .” Appellant contends that his sentence “should have been recalled and dismissed as his possession of less than one ounce of Cannabis has been decriminalized under section 11362.1,” also enacted by Proposition 64. (Capitalization omitted.) Section 11362.1 “makes it lawful for persons aged 21 years and older to engage in various types of conduct involving cannabis, including the possession of up to 28.5 grams of cannabis (approximately one ounce), subject to certain exceptions.” (Raybon,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.