Ngu

Ngu v. City Bail Bonds

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 15, 2021B302296California2,933 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 11/15/

CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FIVE

LANA SIEU NGU, B302296

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC585417) v.

CITY BAIL BONDS, et al.,

Defendants and Appellants.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, David S. Cunningham, III, Judge; and Marc R. Marmaro, Judge. Affirmed. Keiter Appellate Law and Mitchell Keiter for Defendants and Appellants. Influential Law and Van Nghiem for Plaintiff and Respondent.

________________________________________ Plaintiff Lana Sieu Ngu sued bail agents Mylinh Kha and Ethan Kha, doing business as City Bail Bonds, for restitution under California’s unfair competition law (UCL) (Bus. & Prof. Code, §§ 17200, et seq.) based on defendants’ unlawful solicitation of bail. 1 After a bench trial, the trial court ruled in plaintiff’s favor, awarding her $38,666 in restitution. On appeal, defendants argue the trial court erred in finding defendants unlawfully solicited bail from plaintiff in violation of California Code of Regulations, title 10, section 2079. Section 2079…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.