Ngu
Ngu v. City Bail Bonds
Opinion
Opinion
Filed 11/15/
CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION FIVE
LANA SIEU NGU, B302296
Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC585417) v.
CITY BAIL BONDS, et al.,
Defendants and Appellants.
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, David S. Cunningham, III, Judge; and Marc R. Marmaro, Judge. Affirmed. Keiter Appellate Law and Mitchell Keiter for Defendants and Appellants. Influential Law and Van Nghiem for Plaintiff and Respondent.
________________________________________ Plaintiff Lana Sieu Ngu sued bail agents Mylinh Kha and Ethan Kha, doing business as City Bail Bonds, for restitution under California’s unfair competition law (UCL) (Bus. & Prof. Code, §§ 17200, et seq.) based on defendants’ unlawful solicitation of bail. 1 After a bench trial, the trial court ruled in plaintiff’s favor, awarding her $38,666 in restitution. On appeal, defendants argue the trial court erred in finding defendants unlawfully solicited bail from plaintiff in violation of California Code of Regulations, title 10, section 2079. Section 2079…