United States v. Richard Langley
Opinion
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 20-50119 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. Nos. v. 3:16-cr-00393-MMA-1 3:16-cr-00393-MMA
RICHARD LANGLEY, AKA
Richard M Langley, Defendant-Appellant. OPINION
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Michael M. Anello, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted August 30, 2021* Pasadena, California
Filed November 16, 2021
Before: Sandra S. Ikuta, Mark J. Bennett, and Ryan D. Nelson, Circuit Judges.
Per Curiam Opinion
* The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). SUMMARY**
Criminal
The panel affirmed the district court’s denial of Richard Langley’s renewed motion to amend the conditions of his supervised release to permit him to use medical marijuana as allowed by California state law.
Langley, who submitted a report from a physician opining that marijuana was the best medical solution for his pain issues, argued that he has a fundamental constitutional right under the Fourteenth…