People v. Bodner CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 16, 2021C092596California829 words

Opinion

Opinion

Hoch, J.

Filed 11/16/21 P. v. Bodner CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Sacramento) ----

THE PEOPLE, C092596

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 18FE001665)

v.

DUSTIN BODNER,

Defendant and Appellant.

Appointed counsel for defendant Dustin Bodner asks this court to review the record to determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) Finding no arguable error that would result in a disposition more favorable to defendant, we will affirm the judgment. We provide the following brief description of the facts and procedural history of the case. (See People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th 106, 110, 124.)

BACKGROUND1

Defendant and the victim were married in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.