People v. Vanhook CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 17, 2021C090019California3,960 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 11/17/21 P. v. Vanhook CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(San Joaquin) ----

THE PEOPLE, C090019

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. Nos. STK-CR-FE- 2015-0006194 & SF131278A) v.

RAESEAN VANHOOK,

Defendant and Appellant.

Defendant Raesean Vanhook appeals the trial court’s denial of his motions to strike his firearm and prior serious felony enhancements. He argues the trial court abused its discretion when it considered striking his firearm enhancement because the court did not understand the full scope of that discretion Alternatively, to the extent defendant was required to request the trial court impose something less than the full 20-year firearm

1 enhancement at resentencing, his counsel…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.