Opperwall

Opperwall v. Quality Loan Service Corp. CA1/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 17, 2021A159461California3,227 words

Opinion

Opinion

Fujisaki, J.

Filed 11/17/21 Opperwall v. Quality Loan Service Corp. CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

STEPHEN G. OPPERWALL,

Plaintiff and Appellant,

A159461

v. QUALITY LOAN SERVICE (Alameda County CORPORATION, et al., Super. Ct. No. HG19033652) Defendants and Respondents.

Plaintiff Stephen G. Opperwall appeals from a judgment after the trial court sustained without leave to amend the demurrers of defendants Bank of America, N.A. (BANA) and Quality Loan Service Corporation (QLS) (collectively defendants) to Opperwall’s complaint. Opperwall contends the trial court erred by failing to construe ambiguous language in an exhibit to the complaint in his favor and dismissing the case in violation…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.