Haida Group v. Regency Centers CA4/1

Filed 11/17/21 Haida Group v. Regency Centers CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

HAIDA GROUP LLC, D078662

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v. (Super. Ct. No. 37-2020-00027032-

CU-BC-CTL)

REGENCY CENTERS, L.P.,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Richard S. Whitney, Judge. Reversed. Hodel Wilks, Matthew A. Hodel and Frederick L. Wilks for Defendant and Appellant. Sarkissian Law Group, Areg A. Sarkissian and Konstantinos Zinas for Plaintiff and Respondent. We decide this appeal from the denial of an “anti-SLAPP” motion (Code Civ. Proc., § 425.16) by applying the well-settled rule that a plaintiff may not

avoid a special motion to strike…