Getz

Getz v. Superior Court CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 17, 2021C091337California10,751 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 11/17/21 Getz v. Superior Court CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(El Dorado) ----

DEAN GETZ,

C091337

Petitioner, (Super. Ct. No. PC20190335) v.

THE SUPERIOR COURT OF EL DORADO

COUNTY,

Respondent;

COUNTY OF EL DORADO et al.,

Real Parties in Interest.

California has declared, in terms as clear as the English language permits, that government business is the people’s business whether conducted in proceedings by deliberative bodies (Gov. Code, § 54950 et seq.)1 or discussed in records of any form,

All undesignated statutory references are to the Government Code.

1 and must be accessible to the public, though access can be regulated to reduce the administrative burden imposed on government agencies and in rare instances can be denied altogether to prevent the disclosure of records exempt from…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.