Steven Krier v. Adam Fortney

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 17, 202120-36085California517 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 17 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

STEVEN J. KRIER, No. 20-36085

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:20-cv-01073-RSM

v.

MEMORANDUM*

ADAM FORTNEY, Sheriff, Snohomish County; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Ricardo S. Martinez, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 8, 2021**

Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

Steven J. Krier appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging various constitutional claims. We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal under

28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B), Watison v. Carter, 668 F.3d 1108, 1112 (9th Cir.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 2012), and we review for an…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.