Shayla Duke v. Clyde Saiki
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
NOV 17 2021
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
SHAYLA DUKE; DAVID DUKE, No. 20-35155
Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. 6:17-cv-00770-MK
v.
MEMORANDUM*
CLYDE SAIKI, in his personal and official capacity as former Director of Department of Human Services, State of Oregon; et al.,
Defendants-Appellees,
and
DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES;
et al.,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Ann L. Aiken, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted November 8, 2021**
Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Shayla Duke appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing the
Dukes’ action alleging federal claims arising out of the reduction or termination of
government benefits. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We…