Shayla Duke v. Clyde Saiki

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 17, 202120-35155California467 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

NOV 17 2021

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SHAYLA DUKE; DAVID DUKE, No. 20-35155

Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. 6:17-cv-00770-MK

v.

MEMORANDUM*

CLYDE SAIKI, in his personal and official capacity as former Director of Department of Human Services, State of Oregon; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees,

and

DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES;

et al.,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Ann L. Aiken, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 8, 2021**

Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Shayla Duke appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing the

Dukes’ action alleging federal claims arising out of the reduction or termination of

government benefits. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.