Robert Valente v. Bank of America, Na

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 17, 202120-16604California521 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 17 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ROBERT VALENTE, No. 20-16604

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:20-cv-01172-MMC

v.

MEMORANDUM*

BANK OF AMERICA, NA; KELLER

WILLIAMS REALTY, INC.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Maxine M. Chesney, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 8, 2021**

Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

Robert Valente appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing

his diversity action alleging state law claims related to the purchase of a property

and subsequent foreclosure proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1291. We review de novo a dismissal on the basis of the statute of limitations.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.