Robert Valente v. Bank of America, Na
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 17, 202120-16604California521 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 17 2021
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ROBERT VALENTE, No. 20-16604
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:20-cv-01172-MMC
v.
MEMORANDUM*
BANK OF AMERICA, NA; KELLER
WILLIAMS REALTY, INC.,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Maxine M. Chesney, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted November 8, 2021**
Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.
Robert Valente appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing
his diversity action alleging state law claims related to the purchase of a property
and subsequent foreclosure proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1291. We review de novo a dismissal on the basis of the statute of limitations.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).…