Mitchell Siegel v. Dignity Health
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 17 2021
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
MITCHELL SIEGEL; DAWN SIEGEL, No. 20-15485
Plaintiffs, D.C. No. 2:14-cv-02561-SPL
and
MEMORANDUM*
ELIZABETH D. TATE,
Appellant,
v.
DIGNITY HEALTH, DBA Chandler Regional Medical Center, DBA Gilbert Mercy Medical Center,
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Steven Paul Logan, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted November 15, 2021** Phoenix, Arizona
Before: CLIFTON, BRESS, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Appellant Elizabeth Tate appeals the district court’s order imposing sanctions
under 28 U.S.C. § 1927. She argues that the district court abused its discretion by
(1) awarding any sanctions at all, and, alternatively, (2) awarding sanctions in the
amount of…