Mitchell Siegel v. Dignity Health

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 17, 202120-15485California533 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 17 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MITCHELL SIEGEL; DAWN SIEGEL, No. 20-15485

Plaintiffs, D.C. No. 2:14-cv-02561-SPL

and

MEMORANDUM*

ELIZABETH D. TATE,

Appellant,

v.

DIGNITY HEALTH, DBA Chandler Regional Medical Center, DBA Gilbert Mercy Medical Center,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Steven Paul Logan, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 15, 2021** Phoenix, Arizona

Before: CLIFTON, BRESS, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Appellant Elizabeth Tate appeals the district court’s order imposing sanctions

under 28 U.S.C. § 1927. She argues that the district court abused its discretion by

(1) awarding any sanctions at all, and, alternatively, (2) awarding sanctions in the

amount of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.