Jehan Mir v. Ten Unknown Fbi Agents

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 17, 202120-55739California444 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 17 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JEHAN ZEB MIR, M.D., No. 20-55739

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:16-cv-03664-JFW-PJW

v.

MEMORANDUM*

TEN UNKNOWN FBI AGENTS, in Personal, Individual Capacities as Doe 1-10; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California John F. Walter, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 8, 2021**

Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

Jehan Zeb Mir, M.D. appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

dismissing his action brought under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of

Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), alleging federal and state law

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). claims. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.