Demoore Gray v. Ryan Russell

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 17, 202120-16702California436 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 17 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DEMOORE T. GRAY, No. 20-16702

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:19-cv-05842-ROS-DMF

v.

MEMORANDUM*

RYAN RUSSELL, #14388, Mesa Police Officer, in both his official and individual capacities; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Roslyn O. Silver, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 8, 2021**

Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

Arizona state prisoner Demoore T. Gray appeals pro se from the district

court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging federal claims.

We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal for

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). failure to state a claim under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). Hamilton…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.