Anibal Silva v. Riverside County Tax Collector

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 17, 202120-55790California281 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 17 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ANIBAL SILVA, No. 20-55790

Appellant, D.C. No. 5:19-cv-00571-JGB

v.

MEMORANDUM*

RIVERSIDE COUNTY TAX

COLLECTOR; et al.,

Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Jesus G. Bernal, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 8, 2021**

Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

Anibal Silva appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his

bankruptcy appeal for failure to file required documents. We have jurisdiction

under 28 U.S.C. §§ 158(d) and 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion.

Fitzsimmons v. Nolden (In re Fitzsimmons), 920 F.2d 1468, 1471 (9th Cir. 1990).

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). We affirm.

The district court did not abuse…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.