Anibal Silva v. Riverside County Tax Collector
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 17, 202120-55790California281 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 17 2021
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ANIBAL SILVA, No. 20-55790
Appellant, D.C. No. 5:19-cv-00571-JGB
v.
MEMORANDUM*
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TAX
COLLECTOR; et al.,
Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Jesus G. Bernal, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted November 8, 2021**
Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.
Anibal Silva appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his
bankruptcy appeal for failure to file required documents. We have jurisdiction
under 28 U.S.C. §§ 158(d) and 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion.
Fitzsimmons v. Nolden (In re Fitzsimmons), 920 F.2d 1468, 1471 (9th Cir. 1990).
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). We affirm.