Aaron Bishop v. Siji Thomas
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 17, 202120-17461California262 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 17 2021
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
AARON JOSEPH BISHOP, No. 20-17461
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:19-cv-01757-JAT
v.
MEMORANDUM*
SIJI THOMAS, Nurse Practitioner at Corizon Health; et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona James A. Teilborg, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted November 8, 2021**
Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.
Arizona state prisoner Aaron Joseph Bishop appeals pro se from the district
court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging deliberate
indifference to his serious medical needs. We have jurisdiction under
28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Toguchi v. Chung, 391 F.3d 1051, 1056
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). (9th Cir. 2004). We affirm.