Zane Floyd v. Charles Daniels

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 18, 202121-16134California1,248 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 18 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ZANE M. FLOYD, No. 21-16134

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 3:21-cv-00176-RFB-CLB v.

CHARLES DANIELS, Director, Nevada MEMORANDUM* Department of Corrections; et al.,

Defendants-Appellants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Richard F. Boulware II, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted October 26, 2021 San Francisco, California

Before: BERZON, OWENS, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges. Concurrence by Judge BERZON

Charles Daniels, Director of the Nevada Department of Corrections

(“NDOC”), and other NDOC defendants (collectively, the “NDOC Defendants”)

appeal the district court’s order granting inmate Zane M. Floyd’s motions for a

preliminary injunction and a stay of execution. Because this appeal is moot, we

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. dismiss.

A case becomes moot when “the issues presented are…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.