Renard Polk v. Ranaldo Waldo
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 18, 202120-16250California421 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 18 2021
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
RENARD TRUMAN POLK, No. 20-16250
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:16-cv-00652-MMD-CLB
v.
MEMORANDUM*
RANALDO WALDO; JAMES
DONNELLY,
Defendants-Appellees,
and
TARA CARPENTER; et al.,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Miranda M. Du, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted November 8, 2021**
Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.
Former Nevada state prisoner Renard Truman Polk appeals pro se from the
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). district court’s summary judgment for failure to exhaust administrative remedies in
his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging retaliation and deliberate indifference. We
have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Albino v. Baca,