Renard Polk v. Ranaldo Waldo

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 18, 202120-16250California421 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 18 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RENARD TRUMAN POLK, No. 20-16250

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:16-cv-00652-MMD-CLB

v.

MEMORANDUM*

RANALDO WALDO; JAMES

DONNELLY,

Defendants-Appellees,

and

TARA CARPENTER; et al.,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Miranda M. Du, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 8, 2021**

Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

Former Nevada state prisoner Renard Truman Polk appeals pro se from the

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). district court’s summary judgment for failure to exhaust administrative remedies in

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging retaliation and deliberate indifference. We

have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Albino v. Baca,

747…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.