Cir

Mark Blommer v. Cir

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 18, 202120-73394California248 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

NOV 18 2021

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARK ANTHONY BLOMMER, No. 20-73394

Petitioner-Appellant, Tax Ct. No. 469-

v.

MEMORANDUM*

COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL

REVENUE,

Respondent-Appellee.

Appeal from a Decision of the United States Tax Court

Submitted November 8, 2021**

Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

Mark Anthony Blommer appeals pro se from the Tax Court’s order

dismissing for lack of jurisdiction his petition regarding his tax liabilities for the

2004-2006 and 2009-2012 tax years. We have jurisdiction under 26 U.S.C.

§ 7482(a)(1). We review de novo. Gorospe v. Comm’r, 451 F.3d 966, 968 (9th

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Cir. 2006). We affirm.

The Tax Court properly concluded that it lacked jurisdiction over

Blommer’s petition because the petition was untimely. See…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.