Cir
Mark Blommer v. Cir
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 18, 202120-73394California248 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
NOV 18 2021
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
MARK ANTHONY BLOMMER, No. 20-73394
Petitioner-Appellant, Tax Ct. No. 469-
v.
MEMORANDUM*
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL
REVENUE,
Respondent-Appellee.
Appeal from a Decision of the United States Tax Court
Submitted November 8, 2021**
Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.
Mark Anthony Blommer appeals pro se from the Tax Court’s order
dismissing for lack of jurisdiction his petition regarding his tax liabilities for the
2004-2006 and 2009-2012 tax years. We have jurisdiction under 26 U.S.C.
§ 7482(a)(1). We review de novo. Gorospe v. Comm’r, 451 F.3d 966, 968 (9th
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Cir. 2006). We affirm.