Kelly Erickson v. Barbara Von Blanckensee

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 18, 202119-16165California1,149 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 18 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KELLY ERICKSON, No. 19-16165

Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. 4:16-cv-00513-JGZ

v.

MEMORANDUM*

BARBARA VON BLANCKENSEE,

Respondent-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Jennifer G. Zipps, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 16, 2021** San Francisco, California

Before: OWENS, BADE, and LEE, Circuit Judges.

Kelly Erickson appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying his

U.S.C. § 2241 habeas petition. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291.

Reviewing de novo, see Alaimalo v. United States, 645 F.3d 1042, 1047 (9th Cir.

2011), we affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Following military court proceedings, a federal court may only grant a writ

of habeas corpus to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.