Kelly Erickson v. Barbara Von Blanckensee
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 18, 202119-16165California1,149 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 18 2021
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
KELLY ERICKSON, No. 19-16165
Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. 4:16-cv-00513-JGZ
v.
MEMORANDUM*
BARBARA VON BLANCKENSEE,
Respondent-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Jennifer G. Zipps, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted November 16, 2021** San Francisco, California
Before: OWENS, BADE, and LEE, Circuit Judges.
Kelly Erickson appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying his
U.S.C. § 2241 habeas petition. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291.
Reviewing de novo, see Alaimalo v. United States, 645 F.3d 1042, 1047 (9th Cir.
2011), we affirm.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Following military court proceedings, a federal court may only grant a writ
of habeas corpus to…