Enoma Igbinovia v. James Dzurenda

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 18, 202120-16259California580 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

NOV 18 2021

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ENOMA IGBINOVIA, No. 20-16259

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:19-cv-00588-RFB-VCF

v.

MEMORANDUM*

JAMES DZURENDA; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Richard F. Boulware II, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 8, 2021**

Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

Former Nevada state prisoner Enoma Igbinovia appeals pro se from the

district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging

constitutional violations arising from a failure to apply statutory good time and

work/education credits to his minimum and maximum sentences. We have

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal for failure…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.