Cir

Edmund Manzano v. Cir

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 18, 202120-73384California283 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

NOV 18 2021

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

EDMUND V. MANZANO, No. 20-73384

Petitioner-Appellant, Tax Ct. No. 17650-

v.

MEMORANDUM*

COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL

REVENUE,

Respondent-Appellee.

Appeal from a Decision of the United States Tax Court

Submitted November 8, 2021**

Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

Edmund V. Manzano appeals pro se from the Tax Court’s decision

dismissing his petition for failure to state a claim. We have jurisdiction under

U.S.C. § 7482(a)(1). We review de novo. Hongsermeier v. Comm’r, 621 F.3d

890, 899 (9th Cir. 2010). We affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). The Tax Court properly dismissed Manzano’s petition for failure to state a

claim because Manzano did not set forth a clear and concise argument of error, or

any facts demonstrating error, in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.