Cir
Edmund Manzano v. Cir
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 18, 202120-73384California283 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
NOV 18 2021
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
EDMUND V. MANZANO, No. 20-73384
Petitioner-Appellant, Tax Ct. No. 17650-
v.
MEMORANDUM*
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL
REVENUE,
Respondent-Appellee.
Appeal from a Decision of the United States Tax Court
Submitted November 8, 2021**
Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.
Edmund V. Manzano appeals pro se from the Tax Court’s decision
dismissing his petition for failure to state a claim. We have jurisdiction under
U.S.C. § 7482(a)(1). We review de novo. Hongsermeier v. Comm’r, 621 F.3d
890, 899 (9th Cir. 2010). We affirm.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). The Tax Court properly dismissed Manzano’s petition for failure to state a
claim because Manzano did not set forth a clear and concise argument of error, or
any facts demonstrating error, in…