Donald Grant v. Annette Carter

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 18, 202121-35290California299 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 18 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DONALD GRANT, No. 21-35290

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 6:20-cv-00070-BMM

v.

MEMORANDUM*

ANNETTE CARTER; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana Brian M. Morris, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 8, 2021**

Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

Montana state prisoner Donald Grant appeals pro se from the district court’s

judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging federal claims regarding

his parole. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a

dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. Hamilton v. Brown, 630 F.3d 889, 892 (9th

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Cir. 2011). We affirm.

The district court properly…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.