Constance George v. House of Hope Recovery
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 18, 202118-35551California1,126 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FILED
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
NOV 18 2021
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
CONSTANCE GEORGE, No. 18-35551
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:15-cv-01277-SB
v.
MEMORANDUM*
PATRICIA BARCROFT; et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Stacie F. Beckerman, Magistrate Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted November 9, 2021** Portland, Oregon
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel heard oral argument on Plaintiff-Appellant’s claims against Patricia Barcroft and House of Hope Recovery. But the panel unanimously concluded that, as to Plaintiff-Appellant’s claims against Bridges to Change, Inc. and Washington County Department of Housing Services, the case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Before: GRABER and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges, and R. COLLINS,*** District Judge.