Constance George v. House of Hope Recovery

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 18, 202118-35551California1,126 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FILED

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

NOV 18 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

CONSTANCE GEORGE, No. 18-35551

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:15-cv-01277-SB

v.

MEMORANDUM*

PATRICIA BARCROFT; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Stacie F. Beckerman, Magistrate Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted November 9, 2021** Portland, Oregon

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel heard oral argument on Plaintiff-Appellant’s claims against Patricia Barcroft and House of Hope Recovery. But the panel unanimously concluded that, as to Plaintiff-Appellant’s claims against Bridges to Change, Inc. and Washington County Department of Housing Services, the case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Before: GRABER and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges, and R. COLLINS,*** District Judge.

Constance George appeals the district court’s judgment in favor of Patricia

Barcroft, House of Hope Recovery,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.