Balwinder Singh v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 18, 202120-72335California769 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 18 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BALWINDER SINGH, No. 20-72335

Petitioner, Agency No. A206-088-069

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted November 16, 2021** San Francisco, California

Before: SCHROEDER, W. FLETCHER, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

Balwinder Singh, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of a

decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals affirming an immigration judge’s

decision denying his claims for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection

under the Convention Against Torture (CAT). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). § 1252, and we deny the petition for review.

“We review factual…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.