Alejandro Perez v. Linkedin Corporation

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 18, 202121-15234California318 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 18 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ALEJANDRO EVARISTO PEREZ, No. 21-15234

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 5:20-cv-07238-EJD

v.

MEMORANDUM*

LINKEDIN CORPORATION,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Edward J. Davila, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 8, 2021**

Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

Alejandro Evaristo Perez appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

dismissing his action alleging First Amendment and state law claims. We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal for failure to

state a claim under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Cervantes v.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., 656 F.3d 1034, 1040…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.