Agustin Caro-Conde v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 18, 202120-71074California574 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 18 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

AGUSTIN DE JESUS CARO-CONDE, No. 20-71074 AKA Augustin Caro-Conde, Agency No. A206-443-889 Petitioner,

v. MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted November 16, 2021** San Francisco, California

Before: THOMAS, Chief Judge, McKEOWN, Circuit Judge, and RESTANI,*** Judge.

Agustin Caro-Conde petitions for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Jane A. Restani, Judge for the United States Court of International Trade, sitting by designation. (“BIA”) order denying his application for withholding of removal and for relief

under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”).…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.