People v. Cueva CA2/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 18, 2021B310652California1,145 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 11/18/21 P. v. Cueva CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

THE PEOPLE, B310652

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BA444480) v.

NANCY AMPARO CUEVA,

Defendant and Appellant.

THE COURT:

Nancy Amparo Cueva (defendant) appeals from the trial court’s denial of her motion to vacate her plea. Her appointed counsel on appeal filed an opening brief pursuant to People v. Serrano (2012) 211 Cal.App.4th 496 (Serrano), indicating that her review of the entire record revealed no “arguable issues on appeal.” Defendant filed a supplemental brief. We will accordingly review the arguments she raises. (People v. Cole (2020) 52 Cal.App.5th 1023, 1040 (Cole) review granted Oct. 14, 2020,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.