United States v. Harvieux. United States v. Babian

886 F.2d 334 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff/Appellee, v. Roland Joseph HARVIEUX, Defendant/Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff/Appellee, v. Paul Boghaus BABIAN, Defendant/Appellant. No. 88-1065. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Aug. 18, 1989. Decided Sept. 18, 1989. Before SCHROEDER, PREGERSON, and WILLIAM A. NORRIS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM* 2 Roland Joseph Harvieux and Paul Boghaus Babian appeal their convictions, after a jury trial, for conspiracy to pass a forged document and producing a false identification document. Harvieux contends that the district court erred in failing to find that he was the victim of government entrapment and outrageous government conduct. Babian contends that the district court erred in failing to find that Babian was the victim of outrageous government conduct; that the district court abused its discretion when it…