Valvina Alvarez Sanchez v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 19, 202120-73484California590 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 19 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

VALVINA ALVAREZ SANCHEZ; No. 20-73484

RICARDO JIMENEZ ALVAREZ,

Agency Nos. A201-221-987 Petitioners, A201-221-989

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted November 8, 2021**

Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

Valvina Alvarez Sanchez and Ricardo Jimenez Alvarez, natives and citizens

of Mexico, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order

summarily affirming an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying their motion

to continue and their application for asylum and withholding of removal. Our

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). jurisdiction is governed by 8…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.